| |
Savers hope for increases in interest rates whilst borrowers look anxiously for signs that they will go down. It has been a confusing time in recent months, with some pundits saying that rates had peaked and they would not go any higher whilst others claimed that they would still be high at the end of 2008. Currently the situation, as we all know, is that the rates have started to fall, but still the arguments continue.
America's central bank (Federal Reserve) had obviously made up their minds that tough times lay ahead when on January 22nd they cut their interest rate by ¾ point to 3.5% - this was reported to be the biggest US rate cut in 26 years and was a sure sign of very deep concern over the state of the US economy. It was described by Becky Barrow (Daily Mail Business Correspondent) as a desperate bid to calm the global stock market melt down, and implied that a recession was looming. The reaction of the Bank of England indicated that an emergency cut was not being considered and that there were no plans in hand to bring the decision forward from early February.
The UK government reacted to the news with a comment from Ed Balls that the economy is strong and inflation low, but this was not accepted by Mervyn King who is concerned that the known increases in food and fuel costs which are now coming 'on-stream' will fuel inflation, which would be exacerbated by a rate cut now. However, he also hinted that he believes that UK interest rates could usefully be reduced, although there was little prospect of him matching the size of the US rate cut.
We know that Thursday 7th February will provide the answer - with a ¼ point cut to 5.25% being forecasted. This will disappoint some commentators who are pressing for a ½ point cut. The British Chambers of Commerce for example took the bold move in pressing for a ½ point reduction on the basis that the needs of growth in the economy required such a move. On the other hand the CBI expressed hopes that the size of the cut will be kept small.
Obviously once the decision to cut the rate has been agreed, the actual level of the cut is dictated by consideration of inflationary pressures versus the need for growth - this was described by Ian McCafferty as 'a delicate balance'.
|
|